Exercise Guidelines and Benefits:
Key Takeaway: Consistent exercise planning maximizes health benefits, with any activity being better than none.
Everyone knows that exercise is a must, but how much do you actually need? Even with established daily routines schedules can be ever changing, but exercise is one constant that can be incorporated across all lifestyles. The main question that many coaches, personal trainers or health care professionals receive is: How much do I need to exercise? This question has a variety of different answers. This blog will discuss the different exercise recommendations and the many positives that come with daily exercise.
While there are individual variables and restraints to consider, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) highlights the minimum amount of weekly exercise to adopt and maintain a healthy lifestyle. The CDC states adults need to do two types of physical activity each week to improve their health – that is aerobic activity and muscle strengthening (Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2020). Furthermore, the CDC recommends exercising for at least 150 minutes per week and provides examples of how individuals can divide these hours to meet their weekly goals. For example, 150 minutes a week can be broken up into 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week or 50 minutes a day for 3 days a week.
Figure 1. From the CDC shows examples for an adult dividing 150 minutes of exercise throughout the week (Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2020).
Additionally, the CDC recommends that children and adolescents (6-17 years old) should exercise 60 minutes or more a day with a variety of enjoyable moderate-to-vigorous activities a day (Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2020). The most important recommendation for this age group is to get them up, moving and having fun in a safe environment!
Check out Student ATHlete programs for youth athletes ages 8-18. Each class is 60-90 minutes.
Similarly, the American Heart Association (AHA), also recommends that adults need at least 150 minutes per week of moderately-intense aerobic activity or 75 minutes per week of vigorous aerobic activity, or a combination of both, preferably spread throughout the week (Physical Activity Recommendations for Different Age Groups, 2020). While the AHA provides the same recommendations for children and adolescents as the CDC, it recommends adults increase activity to 300 minutes of exercise per week to progress their training and allow for continued health benefits. If time, type, and intensity is not progressed, physiological benefits plateau.
For example, if an individual lifts the same weight, strength gains will eventually plateau if there is no progression; the same goes for health benefits when performing aerobic activity. If an individual performs 150 minutes of aerobic activity a week for a prolonged period with no progression, the body becomes acclimated and plateaus. While benefits attained are not lost, there are no further benefits gained unless progression is implemented.
Our Forever ATHlete classes for adults (ages 18 and up) include a variety of themes to keep you from plateauing. All exercises include progressions and regressions to accommodate any fitness level. Additionally, classes utilize a mix of strength training and cardiovascular moves. Each class is 60 minutes.
Below, examples of moderate and vigorous intensity activities are provided. Note there are progressions both within and across categories of physical activity. For example, a brisk walk can be progressed to a light jog, which will eventually progress to running.
Examples of moderate-intensity activities:
Examples of vigorous-intensity activities:
The main difference between moderate- and vigorous-intensity activities is heart rate. During vigorous activities, the heart rate will be elevated more so than during moderate activity. To develop this concept further, moderate-intensity activities are performed at 50-70% of an individual’s maximum heart rate while vigorous activities are performed at 70-85%. The follow up question to this, of course, is: How do I know what percentage I am at?
First, it is desired that an individual possesses some form of heart monitor to better track their activity, a chest strap device or smartwatch may be the best choice for guiding workouts and performance (Pasadyn, et al. 2019). Second, these ranges can be determined by utilizing the heart rate reserve (HRR) formula. Execute this formula prescribed by the Mayo Clinic (Exercise Intensity: How to Measure It, 2019):
1. Subtract age from 220 to determine maximum heart rate
For example, there is a 40 year old individual that wants to determine their target heart rate range for moderate intensity activity:
1. 220 - 40 = 180
According to a research article published in 2019, wearable heart rate monitors were compared against an echocardiogram (ECG) during and after exercise. Based on the results of the study, a chest strap reflected near similar readings to the ECG. The Apple Watch yielded the second most accurate readings, but provided the most accurate readings amongst other watches (Pasadyn, et al. 2019).
Looking for a fitness tracker to help monitor your progress? Check out this in-depth guide from ConsumersAdvocate.org on choosing the best fitness tracker to support your health and personal fitness goals.
To reap maximum benefits, implementing both moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity, along with strengthening and stretching exercises, is recommended. Having a well balanced, planned out exercise routine will yield greater results than leaving daily/weekly exercise routines to chance. Failing to plan is planning to fail. Remember, an elaborate program is not needed to get started. When planning out weekly exercise, take into consideration that some activity is better than no activity.
The benefits that can be obtained from weekly exercise are endless. These include, but are not limited to, decrease in stress, prolonged life, reduced cancer risk and increased health (specifically cardiovascular function). It is widely accepted exercise is an important component to maintaining health, but knowing the proper amount of exercise needed is key. Whether an individual is just starting, or an individual is well-trained, science and research has developed recommendations on how much, how long and what type of exercise is needed.
So you have all these guidelines and recommendations and strategies to get people active, but people are not listening or have difficulty adhering. Why? One of the major reasons is the lack of time. Some would say you need to make time, for something as important as your health, because if you don’t have health you’re not much good to anybody. Nonetheless, lack of time is a commonly cited issue, so let’s dive into this a little and see if we can come up with a potential fix for the time poor.
The recommendations/guidelines are generally made up of frequency, duration/volume and intensity, which collectively influence the time you spend exercising. To derive the optimal protective effects and benefits from exercise, appropriate frequencies, intensities and durations are no doubt needed. However, it maybe that intensity may be more important than the other two factors, music to the ears of the high intensity intermittent training (HIIT) community. So of interest to some researchers has been whether exercise concentrated into one or two sessions per week, termed the “weekend warrior” pattern (WWP) compared to the regular activity pattern (RAP) where multiple sessions are spread over the week, are different in terms of cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. As is typically the case, some researchers have reported similar benefits whereas others have reported RAP to produce better outcomes. Kunusttor et al. (2023) decided to settle the dissonance via a systematic review and meta-analysis, analysing the published observational cohort studies on the topic including RAP, WWP and inactive physical activity (IPA) patterns.
What do you think they found?
WWP and RAP conferred similar reductions in risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality when compared with IPA patterns. This may be good news for those of you who have busy lifestyles and it is difficult to get exercise in during the week, the WWP better suiting the life you live.
There are a few caveats that the authors point out. First, there is not a lot of literature in the area and the quality of the evidence was deemed low. Second, be aware that RAP may result in better health benefits as most of the beneficial effects of exercise are acute (reduced blood pressure and lipids) and are sustained by regular exercise patterns. Third, because the WWP compresses a more exercise into a shorter time period, there is increased likelihood of musculoskeletal injuries and might not be suitable for people with chronic conditions such as diabetes (Knustor et al., 2023).
At Athlete Training and Health our mission is to provide science-backed, results-driven training for professional, collegiate, high school, and youth athletes, along with everyday individuals so everyone can achieve their personal best. All of our programs are supported by healthcare collaboration, are trusted by professional athletes across the country and are focused on your total health. If this is the starting point for you on your path to fitness and wellness, let us help you!
References
“How Much Physical Activity Do Adults Need?” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 19 Mar. 2020, www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basics/adults/index.htm.
“Physical Activity Recommendations for Different Age Groups” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 19 Mar. 2020, https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/basics/age-chart.html
“Exercise Intensity: How to Measure It”, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, 6 Aug. 2019, www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/fitness/in-depth/exercise-intensity/art-20046887
Pasadyn S, Soundan, Mohamad, Gilinova, Marc et al. Accuracy of commercially available heart rate monitors in athletes: a prospective study. Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. Vol 9, No 4 August 2019.