Written By: Kylie McKenzie, Dietetic Intern with Memorial Hermann IRONMAN Sports Medicine Institute
Edited By: Brett Singer MS, RD, CSSD, LD with Memorial IRONMAN Sports Medicine Institute
Sleep is a critical determinant of health and wellbeing. The recommendation for young adults and adults is 7 to 9 hours per night according to the National Sleep Foundation; however, at least one third of the general population gets less than seven hours of sleep (Hirshkowitz et al, 2015). Insufficient sleep is associated with suppression of energy expenditure, increased appetite and snacking, increased risk for weight gain, and decreased overall health. In the context of athletics, sleep is often overlooked when considering its impact on athletic performance. Lack of adequate sleep can contribute to impaired memory, reduced alertness, increased irritability, and increased risk for injury. There is little evidence supporting a specific influence of one particular sport on sleep; however, it’s been suggested that sleep disorders may be more common in strength/power and contact sports (Nedelec et al, 2018). Training and competing in a sport at a high level is not an easy task and it is notoriously accompanied with high physiological and psychological demands. In balancing the day to day of training and competition schedules, maintaining consistent sleep patterns may be difficult and this may negatively impact performance.
Previous observational studies have identified a positive association between sleep and sports performance in small cohorts of athletes, but have focused on isolated components of performance (strength or speed) rather than game performance, and compared across groups rather than intrapersonally. In a recent study of 112 players from the National Basketball Association (NBA), Jones et al (2019) aimed to address some of these limitations by assessing sleep and game performance in a high-stakes setting of elite athletes.
It has been previously demonstrated that mobile device use at bedtime is associated with inadequate sleep duration, poor sleep quality, and increased sleepiness (Carter et al, 2016); thus, in this present study late-night Twitter activity was used as an indirect measure of sleep restriction. Time-stamped social media activity and in-game individual performance statistics were assessed for players who maintained an active verified Twitter account between 2009 and 2016. Late-night tweeting activity was characterized between 11:00 pm on the night prior to a game and 7:00 am on game day. Both desirable and undesirable performance variables were assessed including total points scored, shooting percentage, rebounds, turnovers, and fouls. To avoid potential confounding variables such as jetlag, analysis was assessed geographically with players from the east coast playing games on the east coast, and the same for players on the west coast.
In games following a late-night tweet versus no late-night tweeting (Table 1), overall players score 1.14 fewer points (95% CI: 0.56-1.73), secure 0.49 fewer rebounds (CI: 0.25-0.74), commit 0.15 fewer turnovers (CI: 0.06-0.025) and 0.22 fewer fouls (CI: 0.12-0.33). The clearest indication of a “performance penalty” following late-night tweeting in next-day game performance among professional NBA athletes was a significantly lower shooting percentage (1.70 percentage points). Players were less active in a game following late-night tweet, but the quality of their play did not necessarily decline. On average, players spent 2 fewer minutes on the court following late-night tweeting (no late-night tweeting: 24.8 minutes, late-night tweeting: 22.8 minutes). Additionally, the effect of late-night tweeting on shooting percentage was larger for away games as compared to home games. Overall, players who stayed up late tweeting exhibited significantly worse performance according to several parameters including number of points scored, shooting percentage, and rebounds. However, in those games, players tended to also commit fewer fouls and turnovers and played for fewer minutes.
Table 1: Performance not following a late-night tweet (No-LNT) compared to following a late-night tweet (LNT)
Variable |
No-LNT |
LNT |
Difference |
t |
P |
Total points scored |
10.56 |
9.42 |
1.14 |
3.86 |
.0002 |
Shooting percentage |
45.35 |
43.65 |
1.70 |
2.11 |
.0376 |
Rebounds |
4.50 |
4.01 |
0.49 |
3.96 |
.0001 |
Turnovers |
1.47 |
1.31 |
0.15 |
3.33 |
.0012 |
Fouls |
2.06 |
1.84 |
0.22 |
4.12 |
.0001 |
These findings may be applicable to other sports and populations in predicting adverse outcomes. Sleep is not only an important measure of health, but also a predictive measure for performance.
Have questions? Please feel free to talk to an Athlete Training and Health Performance Coach or Brett Singer, Sports Dietitian MS, RD, CSSD, LD with the Memorial IRONMAN Sports Medicine Institute. Brett can be reached at brett.singer@memorialhermann.org or can be found on Twitter at @bsinger10.
References
Carter, B., Rees, P., & Hale, L. (2016). Association Between Portable Screen-Based Media Device Access or Use and Sleep Outcomes. JAMA Pediatric, 170(12), 1202-1208.
Hirshkowitz, M., Whiton, K., Albert, S.M., et al. (2015). National Sleep Foundation’s sleep time duration recommendations: methodology and results summary. Sleep Health, 1(1), 40-43.
Jones, J.J., Kirschen, G.W., Kancharla, S., & Hale, L. (2019). Association between late-night tweeting and next-day game performance among professional basketball players. Sleep Health, 5, 68-71.
Nedelec, M., Aloulou, A., Duforez, F., Meyer, T., & Dupont, G. (2018). The Variability of Sleep Among El